BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 states:

• “Except where the recommendations of other safety standards apply, circuits of safety services shall be independent of other circuits.” Reg 560.7.1  and
• “Safety circuit cables, other than metallic screened, fire-resistant cables, shall be adequately and reliably separated by distance or by barriers from other circuit cables, including other safety circuit cables.” Reg 560.7.7

Although a typical 120-minute rated cable, i.e. FP600, has a metallic screened armour and therefore is not strictly subject to Reg. 560.7.7, this regulation provides the clearest engineering precedent for the principle of distance as a compliant alternative to barriers.

BS 8519:2020: Diverse Routes and Fire Protection

• “Both primary and the secondary supplies should be protected against fire and water damage and be separated from each other throughout the installation, by adopting diverse cable routes” Cl. 7.1, and 
• ” The components of the primary supply should be separated from the components of the secondary supply so that a failure of a cable or equipment in either supply does not affect the other supply” Cl. 6.1.
• Where primary and secondary routes converge, they should be “separated by fire compartmentation” with fire-survival time ≥120 min for circuit category 3. Cl. 7.3.

UK Benchmarks for Separation

• BS 5839-1:2025, 11.2.13 “If the CIE is supplied with power from power supply equipment contained in a separate enclosure, the cables between the equipment should be duplicated such that a single open or short circuit in the connections does not completely remove power from the CIE. The duplicate cables should be separated by at least 300 mm where practicable.”
• IET Guidance Note 4 (10th edition), on Regulation 560.7.7: “It is necessary for cabling other than metallic screened fire-resistant cables forming part of a safety circuit to be effectively and reliably separated from the cabling of other circuits”, by distance or by barrier. GN4 gives no distance.

Although these two UK sources are not an explicit requirement, the BS 5839-1 figure provides the precedent for roof-mounted LV life-safety power supplies, as a reasonable engineering judgement, for adopting 300 mm as a reliable design distance when a fire-rated barrier is impractical.

Project application

• Each (Primary and Secondary) 120min rated supply cable shall be installed on its own lidded steel tray.

• A clear horizontal air gap of ≥ 300 mm shall be maintained between tray edges along all parallel runs on the roof.

• Where the gap cannot be preserved (e.g. parapet penetrations) a 120-minute Durasteel® baffle shall be fitted in accordance with BS 8519 Cl. 7.3.

• Structural support systems (e.g. Big Foot frames) provide a load-bearing function and do not require a fire rating. Fire resistance requirements apply to cable containment and supports within fire compartments, not to external rooftop support frames. For rooftop installations, compliance is achieved through the use of fire-rated cables (e.g. FP600) and adequate separation in accordance with BS 8519:2020 Clause 7.3 and BS 5839‑1:2025 Clause 11.2.13

• Cable tray mounting brackets and cable securing fixings are fire-rated to maintain circuit integrity

Compliance statement

The 300 mm air-gap satisfies:

• BS 7671 Reg. 560.7.1, circuits remain independent.

• BS 7671 Reg. 560.7.7, separation “by distance” is an acceptable alternative to barriers.

• BS 8519 Cl. 7.1 & 6.1, ensures separation of primary and secondary supplies.

• BS 5839‑1:2025 Cl. 11.2.13 and IET GN4: BS 5839-1 provides a UK precedent for 300 mm separation for life-safety circuits.

This design statement provides a defensible, standards-based justification for using a 300 mm physical separation in lieu of a roof-mounted 120‑minute fire barrier.